Glamorgan 301 for 5 dec (Ingram 82, Zain-ul-Hassan 65, Root 53, Thomson 4-97) and 135 for 6 (Byrom 32, Cooke 25*) drew with Derbyshire 450 for 8 dec (Reece 139,
Yorkshire 262 for 6 dec (Hill 52, Revis 51*, Bess 48*) and 363 for 4 (Masood 123, Wharton 89, Lyth 51) beat Worcestershire 389 (D’Oliveira 103, Kashif Ali 93, Allison
Durham 457 for 8 dec (Bedingham 156, Clark 119, Borthwick 63) xxx Leicestershire 143 (Raine 5-51, Fernando 4-40) and 173 by an innings and 141 runs Durham sealed an emphatic
Sussex 202 (Haines 62, Carson 56, Taylor 5-24) and 505 for 7 dec (Coles 128, Alsop 79, Clark 72, Orr 67, Hudson-Prentice 71*) beat Gloucestershire 195 (Hammond 48, Carson 3-19,
Derbyshire 450 for 8 dec (Reece 139, Guest 96, Wagstaff 78) and 68 for 0 lead Glamorgan 301 for 5 dec (Ingram 82, Zain-ul-Hassan 65, Root 53, Thomson 4-97) by
Gloucestershire 195 (Hammond 48, Carson 3-19, Currie 3-36, Hunt 3-52) and 113 for 5 (Hunt 3-19) need another 400 runs to beat Sussex 202 and 505 for 7 dec (Coles
Worcestershire 389 (D’Oliveira 103, Kashif Ali 93, Allison 75) and 18 for 2 lead Yorkshire 262 for 6 dec (Hill 52, Revis 51*, Bess 48*) by 145 runs Yorkshire declared
Leicestershire 143 (Raine 5-51, Fernando 4-40) and 13 for 0 trail Durham 457 for 8 dec (Bedingham 156, Clark 119, Borthwick 63) by 301 runs Durham need 10 wickets on
Glamorgan 22 for 0 (Zain-ul-Hassan 15*, Bryom 5*) trail Derbyshire 450 for 8 dec (Reece 139, Guest 96, Wagstaff 78) by 428 runs Mitchell Wagstaff ^(https://lotus365.today/goto/https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/mitchell-wagstaff-1197013) notched his highest first-class
Sussex 202 and 256 for 3 (Clark 72, Orr 67, Coles 51*) lead Gloucestershire 195 (Hammond 48, Carson 3-19, Currie 3-36, Hunt 3-52) by 263 runs It’s been a disappointing